US-Iran Final Nuclear DealSeptember 30

ResolvedOutcome: NoVol$2.4MResolvedas of

Odds now

This market has resolved No. Final market pricing put YES at 0%, as of .

YES0¢
NO100¢

24has of

What moved the odds?

38 AI-matched news signals on this market, newest first. Entry price is the called side when the news hit; the signed return marks it against the final price as of .

NOiranintl94%match99¢+1%
US President Donald Trump said in his speech at the 81st session of the General Assembly of the United Nations on Tuesday, September 21, that he would never allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon, adding that the Islamic Republic had rejected his offer of full economic cooperation in exchange for ending its nuclear program and supporting terrorism. He added: "I have a big decision to make. Will there be a deal with the Islamic Republic that will allow them to rebuild their country and make it a much greater country than it has ever been? Maybe one of the greatest countries in the Middle East or even the world." Trump continued: "Or do I destroy the Islamic Republic and do it quickly, without ever giving them a chance to kill people and destroy countries again?"
NOalarabiya91%match99¢+1%
Trump: I think we'll reach a deal with Iran after the US midterm elections.
NOalarabiya93%match99¢+1%
Trump: Iran will never get a nuclear weapon, and we will reach a deal after the US midterm elections. ====== US President Donald Trump before the UN General Assembly: Iran continues to develop ballistic missiles and will never get a nuclear weapon. The Iranian regime has killed more than 72,000 citizens this year, and inflation has reached 300%. Iran violated the ceasefire agreement by attacking commercial ships, and we sank 159 Iranian vessels. I believe we will reach a deal with Iran after the US midterm elections. The US Navy has escorted more than one billion barrels through the Strait of Hormuz, and more shipments are now flowing. From Al Arabiya
NOIran Semi-Official ILNA92%match99¢+1%
Trump: I think we will reach an agreement with Iran immediately after the US elections In his speech to the UN General Assembly, the US President, while reiterating his anti-Iranian stance, announced the possibility of an agreement with Tehran after the US elections. @ilnair
NOthetimes.com91%match99¢+1%
Live: Trump: Deal with Iran after US midterms
NOIraq State News Agency (INA)91%match99¢+1%
Trump: We will reach a deal with Iran after the US midterm elections.
NOiranintl92%match99¢+1%
A senior Islamic Republic official told Reuters on Tuesday, September 21, that an “Iranian delegation” with full authority to revive diplomacy with the United States is in New York. Reuters quoted the senior Islamic Republic official as saying: “Tehran welcomes the revival of diplomacy if the United States takes concrete steps.” He also added in the conversation: “The details of an agreement to end hostilities with the United States can be discussed through mediators in New York.” The senior Islamic Republic official said: “Iran can reopen the Strait of Hormuz within seven days if the US reduces military pressure and lifts the blockade of ports.” He continued to tell Reuters: “The Islamic Republic’s proposal was presented to the United States on September 15 through mediators.”
NOalmayadeenlive93%match99¢+1%
A senior Iranian official told Reuters: Our proposal was delivered to the United States through intermediaries on September 16.
NOiranintlbrk94%match99¢+1%
Senior Iranian official told Reuters: The Islamic Republic's proposal was presented to the United States through mediators on September 15.
NOIranian Journalist92%match99¢+1%
US President Donald Trump announced in an interview with Fox News on Sunday, September 19, that he is making a decision about Iran and that "very big things will happen in the near future" regarding Iran. Trump said that the current options on the table include "obliterate Iran," "leave it to economic erosion," or "make a deal." The US President also said: "My question is when and if I'm going to blow up the whole of Iran," adding: "They better change their behavior." Trump said he is also ready to meet with Masoud Pezzekian on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly this week. He went on to say that some Iranian officials are in hiding and that it is impossible to find people who are capable of reaching an agreement. These remarks come as the Khatam al-Anbiya headquarters of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps announced in a statement on Sunday that it had received intelligence A finding that the US is preparing to resume an attack on Iran with the support of "some countries in the region." @VahidOOnLine @VahidOnline
NOIranian Journalist91%match99¢+1%
US President Donald Trump announced on Thursday, September 16, in an interview with the Axios website, that he is on the verge of making a fateful decision about “destroying our Iranian enemies.” Indicating that he is facing a big decision, Trump said: “Do I want to go in and destroy them or not? Anything can happen on my part.” He added that Tehran is in direct contact with the United States and is willing to reach an agreement. The US president also said that no ships have reached Iran since the naval blockade was re-established in July — after the failure of a memorandum of understanding between the two countries to end the war. @VahidOOnLine @VahidOnline
NOiranintl96%match99¢+1%
US President Donald Trump said on Sunday, September 12, during a trip to Ireland, that the "Iran affair" may end before the US midterm elections, but in any case, it will end after these elections. Regarding the possibility of an agreement with the Islamic Republic, Trump said: "Iran really wants to make a deal. They keep calling and wanting to make a deal, but the deal has to be the right one. I will not accept a deal that is not good." The US President also said about the meeting of the Persian Gulf countries with the Islamic Republic: "I don't care if the Persian Gulf countries meet with Iran; that's up to them." In response to a question about the decision of the US Federal Reserve next week, he also said that the United States should have the lowest interest rate in the world.
NOIranian Journalist93%match99¢+1%
The US President said on Wednesday, September 8, that in his view, the war with Iran will end "immediately" after the US midterm elections. Donald Trump told reporters before leaving for Dallas to attend the Republican Party convention: "I think the war will end immediately after the election. Because they (Iran) can't last anymore." Trump added about the situation in Iran: "They are desperate and they are trying to influence the election." In response to a question about the widespread attacks by both sides around the Strait of Hormuz, Trump said: "The attacks were carried out by us. We hit nine of their oil tankers. There are going to be more attacks." @VahidHeadline @VahidOnline
NOiranintl93%match99¢+1%
Bloomberg reported on Monday, September 6, that the United States intends to propose referring the Islamic Republic's nuclear file to the United Nations Security Council at this week's meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency's Board of Governors in Vienna. Bloomberg wrote that, according to a two-page draft of the US resolution it has seen, Washington wants the Islamic Republic to "immediately address its non-compliance" and allow inspections to be carried out to ensure "no diversion of nuclear material." According to Bloomberg, over the past 15 months, the agency's inspectors have been unable to examine the Islamic Republic's uranium stockpile or confirm the location of uranium enriched close to the level needed to make a nuclear weapon. The agency has also been unable to verify the Islamic Republic's activities at a fortified mountain site south of the main enrichment facility in Natanz. Inspectors have not yet been able to return to the damaged facilities at Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz. Last week, Donald Trump announced the possibility of new attacks on nuclear facilities located deep underground, saying the United States may target Mount Ghazla "very soon."
NOIran Foreign Ministry92%match99¢+1%
Meeting of the Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs with the media, Monday, September 16, 1405, answer to question 21: We were never the ones who initiated the breach of the agreement. The United States is the party that has breached the agreement, has not fulfilled its obligations, and the fact that some American officials, within the framework of the disputes that exist among themselves, some American officials did not believe in this understanding from the beginning, the internal dispute of the American ruling body was one of the factors that led to the US breaching the agreement. This is an issue that they must answer. The international community, our region, our own nation are witnessing that it is the American side that has breached the agreement, and now they proudly announce that in their view it is over. Names are not important to us. Whether they call it an understanding or anything else is not important; what is important is that in any form, in any form, and at any time, as long as the interests of the Islamic Republic of Iran are not secured, we will not witness the return of security to the region. We will definitely not compromise on our own interests, on our national interests and our vital interests. @MFAIran [in reply to: Meeting of the Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs with the media, Monday, September 16, 1405, Question 21: The US Secretary of State recently claimed that the understanding between Iran and the US has ended. From Iran's perspective, is this understanding still legally and politically valid, or does the Islamic Republic of Iran also consider this understanding to be ended in some way? @MFAIran]
NOIran Semi-Official ILNA96%match99¢+1%
US Energy Secretary Ties Nuclear Deal with Iran to Tehran's Future Government! The US Energy Secretary, skeptical about the possibility of an agreement with Iran, tied the achievement of a nuclear deal to Tehran's political future, saying that the deal may be postponed until the next government comes to power. @ilnair
NOWalter Bloomberg94%match99¢+1%
U.S.–IRAN ESCALATION • • The U.S. is reportedly striking Iranian targets around the Strait of Hormuz, while explosions have been reported on Iran’s Qeshm Island. • • As tensions rise, Kalshi puts the odds of a U.S.–Iran nuclear deal before 2029 at just 27%. •
NOIranian Journalist93%match99¢+1%
US President Donald Trump said on Sunday evening, September 29, that the Islamic Republic will not acquire nuclear weapons, and stressed that it does not necessarily need to sign an agreement with the Iranian regime to win the war. In an interview with Fox News, President Trump said that the US naval blockade and financial pressure have dealt heavy blows to the Islamic Republic, and that the regime is now collapsing. He added: "At the right time, either we will win or they will do something; but I have no problem with just winning. I don't need to sign a piece of paper." The US President called the Iranian regime "the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism" and said: "We cannot allow them to have nuclear weapons, and they will not have nuclear weapons." In an interview with "Fox News," US President Donald Trump defended his administration's military actions and policies toward Tehran, saying: "If I had not been president, there would have been no Israel left, and most likely no Middle East at all." Emphasizing that the Iranian regime would use nuclear weapons if it obtained them, Trump added: "Countries that had been neutral for years were immediately targeted when the conflict began. From Saudi Arabia and Qatar to the UAE, Bahrain and Kuwait, they were targeted, and everyone was surprised by this action. This caused Iran to completely lose their support and neutrality." The US President continued by emphasizing the need to prevent Tehran from advancing its nuclear goals, stating: "If they had nuclear weapons, they would have fired them, and after destroying Israel and the Middle East, the next target would be us or Europe. You cannot let them get nuclear weapons, and they will never have nuclear weapons." @VahidOOnLine @VahidOnline
NOmoney.udn.com93%match98¢+2%
The 60-day negotiation period has expired, but the differences between the US and Iran remain unresolved. Trump says he will not seek an extension.
NON13/GLZ Reporters92%match97¢+3%
Iran responds to Trump: Senior Iranian official to Reuters - "Tehran has decided to change policy from defensive to offensive. We have set a final deadline of several weeks for the US to fully implement the memorandum of understanding - the US and regional countries will receive notification of the timetable that Iran will set through the mediators. We will not wait for the US to continue the naval blockade indefinitely. Relying on the mediators to reach a permanent agreement is unrealistic." [in reply to: On the 60th day of the memorandum of understanding between Iran and the US (which has long been irrelevant) - President Trump starts his morning with a tweet: "The number one goal is - and always will be - that Iran will not be able to possess nuclear weapons in any way"]
NOcnn.com93%match97¢+3%
Live: An agreement between the US and Iran has expired — what now?
NOsharghdaily91%match97¢+3%
Al-Arabiya: Reports indicate that an agreement has been reached to extend the 60-day ceasefire period between Iran and the United States.
NOaljazeera.com93%match97¢+3%
Live: Iran says 60-day deadline ‘entirely moot’ after US violated memorandum
NOnews.ntv.co.jp94%match97¢+3%
The US-Iran memorandum of understanding is set to expire in 60 days, but there is no prospect of a breakthrough...the situation is likely to drag on.
NOIranian Media92%match97¢+3%
New York Times: Iran War Has Become a Battle of Political Will and Economic Resilience US Media: The ceasefire that US President Donald Trump announced with Iran in June was supposed to lead to a broader agreement within 60 days to end the war and limit Iran's nuclear program, but that deadline, which expires on Monday, has effectively been shelved. The war has now become a contest of political will and economic resilience with no end in sight. There is little sign that Iran and the United States have held extensive talks on Iran's nuclear program since the June ceasefire, let alone reached a framework that is acceptable to both sides. isna.ir/xdWTrx @isna94
NOentekhab_news92%match97¢+3%
Today is the expiration date of the 60-day Iran-US Memorandum of Understanding, which can be extended, but there is currently no news of an extension. /Election
NOFox Reporter92%match96¢+4%
The Memorandum of Understanding between the United States and Iran expires tomorrow. Reports indicate little diplomatic progress on reaching another deal as tension remains high across the Middle East.
NOyomiuri.co.jp94%match95¢+5%
The US-Iran "memorandum of understanding" is set to expire in 60 days... but no substantive negotiations on the nuclear issue have taken place, and there are no moves to extend the deadline.
NOIranian Media91%match95¢+5%
Pakistan: 60-day deadline for Iran-US talks can be extended The spokesperson for the Pakistani Foreign Ministry announced: The 60-day deadline set in the Islamabad understanding for negotiations and reaching a final agreement between Iran and the US will be extendable. Islamabad says it will continue its mediation efforts to bring Tehran and Washington back to the negotiating table; meaning the end of this deadline does not necessarily mean the end of the path of diplomacy. @IRIBNEWS_COM
NOPBS Reporter91%match93¢+8%
Our Friday night @NewsHour story on how the US thought it was close to a deal, why the US and Arabs think there hasn't been a deal, and analysis from @therealBehnamBT and @AliVaez -- who often disagree, but both told me Iran is playing for time, and thinks time is on it side.
NObbc.com99%match86¢+16%
Live: US and Iran behaving as if peace deal is dead
NOdbws.io99%match70¢+43%
Iran foreign minister says US threats are an impediment to deal-making
NOalarabiya98%match70¢+43%
Scenarios for the failure of the "Memorandum of Understanding": Trump is considering large-scale attacks, precision strikes, or special operations against Iran.
NOalarabiya98%match70¢+43%
Scenarios for the failure of the "Memorandum of Understanding": Trump is considering large-scale attacks, precision strikes, or special operations against Iran.
NOalhadath99%match70¢+43%
US-Iran negotiations: The Wall Street Journal reports that Trump was briefed in recent days on the option of "returning to all-out war against Tehran."
NOAxios Reporter99%match70¢+43%
"Parties gave 60 days to reach a comprehensive nuclear deal, but 2 wks into that window, they're still arguing over terms of the MOU they already signed. Currently, collapse of that initial deal looks more likely than agreement on a final one." @BarakRavid
NOynet.co.il99%match70¢+43%
Iran announces end of Qatar talks
YESIranian Journalist98%match28¢-100%
Donald Trump wrote in a post: "Iran has requested a meeting. (This meeting) will be in Doha tomorrow.” Previously, Kazem Gharibabadi, head of the Islamic Republic’s technical negotiating team, denied some media reports that Tehran and Washington planned to hold talks on Tuesday. Kazem Gharibabadi, head of Iran’s technical negotiating team, said today: “Although consultations with Qatar, including on following up on the implementation of the other party’s commitments, are ongoing as usual, the news from some media outlets that technical talks by the working groups will be held in Doha cannot be confirmed.” He continued by saying that “the first round of technical talks within the framework of the designated working groups will be held when conditions are met and after an agreement is reached on its date and location, and consultations in this regard are continuing through the intermediary countries.” @VahidHeadline “Caroline Leavitt,” White House spokeswoman, announced on Monday, July 28, 1405, that “Steve Whittock,” the US President’s special representative on Middle East affairs, and Jared Kushner, former White House senior adviser and informal adviser to Donald Trump on Middle East affairs, will attend the Doha meeting with representatives of the Islamic Republic on Tuesday. @VahidHeadline @VahidOnline

Where does the news lean?

17YES109NO40neutraltrailing 24h

Average match confidence across the listed signals: 94%.

How did this market resolve?

On June 14, 2026, the United States and Iran announced a written diplomatic agreement, including a 60-day extendable period in which both countries committed to negotiate toward a “final deal” regarding Iran’s nuclear program and other topics. This market resolves to “Yes” if a qualifying written diplomatic instrument between the United States and Iran has been mutually signed or adopted by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market resolves to “No.” Unless the written instrument is formally adopted without signature as described below, the instrument must be signed by both the United States and Iran. Both parties must either sign the same document or sign individual documents that substantively and directly indicate acceptance of the same underlying instrument, regardless of minor formatting, wording, or translation differences between the signed versions. Both physical signatures and officially-issued electronic signatures will qualify as signatures. If the written instrument is recognized by the United States and Iran as not requiring signature for execution, formal adoption of the instrument by both countries without signature will qualify. Formal adoption may be established by official actions, including: (i) an official joint statement announcing that the United States and Iran have adopted, approved, executed, concluded, or otherwise finalized the instrument; (ii) mutual official confirmation that the same published instrument has been agreed to, adopted, approved, executed, or concluded by both countries; (iii) adoption, approval, or endorsement through an official resolution, ministerial decision, executive decision, or equivalent institutional act, where that act is the mechanism by which the relevant country adopts the instrument; or (iv) an exchange of official diplomatic notes or letters confirming acceptance of the same instrument. A qualifying written diplomatic instrument must: (i) Be identified as the final deal contemplated by the June 14, 2026, memorandum of understanding, either in official United States or Iranian communications, or by a consensus of credible reporting; (ii) Establish at least one specific obligation limiting Iran's nuclear program through a concrete, measurable benchmark against which compliance could be tested, which may take the form of a defined limit, prohibition, or quantity (e.g., a specific cap on the purity level to which Iran may enrich uranium, or an explicit commitment for Iran to surrender, destroy, or dilute its enriched uranium stockpile). Non-specific or vague restrictions, with no defined metric (e.g., a pledge not to pursue nuclear weapons, a commitment to maintain the status quo, or an agreement to abide IAEA monitoring or inspections requirements that do not specifically restrict Iran’s nuclear program) will not qualify. The content of the qualifying instrument must be expressed as an agreed obligation to be implemented. The following do not qualify: (i) a provision the substantive obligation of which remains explicitly subject to a future agreement, negotiation process, or mutually agreed follow-on instrument; (ii) a provision explicitly framed as a minimum requirement for a future negotiation, rather than a present obligation; (iii) a floor, placeholder, or minimum standard established explicitly for the purpose of structuring ongoing or future talks. A definite and unconditional obligation may qualify, even if technical or procedural details, including the exact implementation date, timeframe, or sequencing, remain subject to future arrangements, provided that the obligation still establishes a concrete, measurable benchmark against which compliance could be tested. Conditional obligations do not qualify. Whether an instrument qualifies will be primarily determined by its officially released text. A qualifying instrument must be signed or formally adopted by both the United States and Iran by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. If such an instrument is signed or formally adopted by that time, but the complete text has not been released, and genuine material ambiguity remains as to whether it satisfies this market’s requirements, this market may remain open for up to 28 calendar days after the specified date pending release of the text. If the text has still not been released after 28 calendar days, official and definitive announcements from the United States or Iran, and a consensus of credible reporting, will be used to determine whether the instrument qualifies. An instrument to which parties other than the United States and Iran are also party will qualify, provided that both the United States and Iran are parties to the instrument and all other requirements are satisfied. Once a diplomatic instrument has been signed or formally adopted without signature by both the United States and Iran and confirmed to satisfy the requirements of a qualifying written diplomatic instrument, this market’s condition is met, regardless of whether the instrument later enters into force, is ratified, receives legislative or treaty consent, or is subsequently repudiated, withdrawn from, or not implemented by the United States or Iran. The primary resolution sources for this market will be official communications from the governments of the United States and Iran, or their authorized representatives. A consensus of credible reporting from major news agencies of record may also be used.

Related markets

See all outcomes for US-Iran Final Nuclear Deal — the full event, with combined odds and signal timeline.