US-Iran Final Nuclear DealAugust 18
ResolvedOutcome: No$2.7Mas of
Odds now
This market has resolved No. Final market pricing put YES at 0%, as of .
YES0¢
NO100¢
as of
What moved the odds?
22 AI-matched news signals on this market, newest first. Entry price is the called side when the news hit; the signed return marks it against the final price as of .
FWD from Mehr International: The “Ramadan War” Case/126;
The US has no good option to exit the Iran war; Iran did not surrender Associated Press: The 60-day deadline set to end the Iran war and reach a nuclear deal expired on Monday, and the two sides are further apart than ever. According to the report, the current negotiations are focused solely on opening the Strait of Hormuz and lifting the US blockade, and there is no sign of a compromise on the strait or the start of serious nuclear talks. The Islamic Republic of Iran has consolidated its control over this strategic waterway by citing a vague clause in the agreement. The Guardian: Gasoline prices in the US have reached their highest level recorded for August. According to data from the American Automobile Association (AAA), the average price per gallon of gasoline reached $4.06 on Monday, 5 cents more than the previous week and a dollar more expensive than last year. In California and Hawaii, this figure has risen to about $5.50 per gallon. Al-Mayadeen: The Trump administration's threat to impose more pressure and economic sanctions on Iran, contrary to Washington's belief, will not necessarily lead to Tehran's surrender and could even have heavy costs for the global economy. Vedomosti newspaper: US President Donald Trump's decision to reduce Washington's participation in joint exercises with South Korea was made in a situation where the US has simultaneously transferred a significant part of its military resources to the Middle East. Xinhua: About six months after the start of the Iran war, the aircraft carrier "Abraham Lincoln" has become a symbol of the consequences of Washington's military approach; A war whose continuation has exhausted American forces, strained the country's military resources, and imposed increasing costs on the United States, without Washington having achieved a decisive result. mehrnews.com/x3cQwG @MehrnewsIntl
With the 60-day period set by the June US-Iran memorandum now over and no final agreement in place, Washington faces a choice between intensifying pressure, renewing major strikes or settling into a prolonged and unstable holding pattern. •
The United States and Iran have agreed to extend the 60-day ceasefire under the Islamabad Memorandum, Anadolu News Agency reports. The agreement was originally set to expire on August 17. The parties have not yet agreed on the exact extension period, according to the agency's sources. The United States and Iran signed a memorandum of understanding on June 17. The text stated that the countries pledge to respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to refrain from interfering in each other's internal affairs. On June 26, the United States and Iran exchanged blows despite the agreement and accused each other of violating the ceasefire. More IZ RU news in MAX
US may seek to end the deal without a nuclear agreement; US and Iran's six conditions make it difficult.
Axios: Two regional sources said Araqchi had agreed in principle to the deal last weekend, but it still needed approval from Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei and the Supreme National Security Council. A U.S. official and a regional source said the process of approving the deal by Iranian officials was completed on Tuesday.
Why The US And Iran Are Far From A Deal. • After five months, Iran and the United States are far from resolving the conflict. A former national security official says the most likely outcome is a frozen conflict.
Live: Iran leaders likely to walk away from US deal after deadly attacks
Live: US is pessimistic over prospects of Iran nuclear deal: WSJ
U.S. military launches new Iran strikes as Trump says 'not sure' he wants deal
Trump: "We made a deal with Iran, but the Iranians acted as if we hadn't agreed to anything."
Live: Iran vows it 'won't fold' after accusing US of violating agreement
The march towards a final nuclear deal continues to go…backwards. • • US revokes oil sanctions waiver after Iran Strait attacks. • •
Live: How war on Iran changed the global energy sector forever
Qatar & Pakistan mediators concluded separate meetings with the US & Iranian negotiators in Doha today, with positive progress made on issues related to the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding, building on the outcomes of the Lake Lucerne Summit. The parties agreed to continue discussions over the coming period, with the next meeting to be scheduled at the earliest possible time following the funeral processions of the former Iranian Supreme Leader.
Conversation - Continued violations of war-ending MoU with Iran prove US cannot be trusted: Analyst • •
"Parties gave 60 days to reach a comprehensive nuclear deal, but 2 wks into that window, they're still arguing over terms of the MOU they already signed. Currently, collapse of that initial deal looks more likely than agreement on a final one." @BarakRavid
Iran says the US violated commitments made in the memorandum of understanding and will establish a monitoring mechanism to review violations.
Political analyst Ayed Al-Manna: Iran has been obstructing the implementation of the memorandum of understanding since day one, exploiting Trump's desire to avoid a return to war and the desire of regional states for stability.
Axios: The collapse of the 60-day deadline for a comprehensive nuclear agreement between the US and Iran is more likely than reaching a final agreement. #Breaking #Here_is_the_Kingdom
Iran announces end of Qatar talks
Trump says U.S. and Iran will meet to negotiate after days of strikes
Iran's senior negotiator denies new round of talks with U.S. scheduled
Where does the news lean?
12YES37NO24neutraltrailing 24h
Average match confidence across the listed signals: 98%.
How did this market resolve?
On June 14, 2026, the United States and Iran announced a written diplomatic agreement, including a 60-day extendable period in which both countries committed to negotiate toward a “final deal” regarding Iran’s nuclear program and other topics.
This market resolves to “Yes” if a qualifying written diplomatic instrument between the United States and Iran has been mutually signed or adopted by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market resolves to “No.”
Unless the written instrument is formally adopted without signature as described below, the instrument must be signed by both the United States and Iran. Both parties must either sign the same document or sign individual documents that substantively and directly indicate acceptance of the same underlying instrument, regardless of minor formatting, wording, or translation differences between the signed versions. Both physical signatures and officially-issued electronic signatures will qualify as signatures.
If the written instrument is recognized by the United States and Iran as not requiring signature for execution, formal adoption of the instrument by both countries without signature will qualify. Formal adoption may be established by official actions, including:
(i) an official joint statement announcing that the United States and Iran have adopted, approved, executed, concluded, or otherwise finalized the instrument;
(ii) mutual official confirmation that the same published instrument has been agreed to, adopted, approved, executed, or concluded by both countries;
(iii) adoption, approval, or endorsement through an official resolution, ministerial decision, executive decision, or equivalent institutional act, where that act is the mechanism by which the relevant country adopts the instrument; or
(iv) an exchange of official diplomatic notes or letters confirming acceptance of the same instrument.
A qualifying written diplomatic instrument must:
(i) Be identified as the final deal contemplated by the June 14, 2026, memorandum of understanding, either in official United States or Iranian communications, or by a consensus of credible reporting;
(ii) Establish at least one specific obligation limiting Iran's nuclear program through a concrete, measurable benchmark against which compliance could be tested, which may take the form of a defined limit, prohibition, or quantity (e.g., a specific cap on the purity level to which Iran may enrich uranium, or an explicit commitment for Iran to surrender, destroy, or dilute its enriched uranium stockpile). Non-specific or vague restrictions, with no defined metric (e.g., a pledge not to pursue nuclear weapons, a commitment to maintain the status quo, or an agreement to abide IAEA monitoring or inspections requirements that do not specifically restrict Iran’s nuclear program) will not qualify.
The content of the qualifying instrument must be expressed as an agreed obligation to be implemented. The following do not qualify:
(i) a provision the substantive obligation of which remains explicitly subject to a future agreement, negotiation process, or mutually agreed follow-on instrument;
(ii) a provision explicitly framed as a minimum requirement for a future negotiation, rather than a present obligation;
(iii) a floor, placeholder, or minimum standard established explicitly for the purpose of structuring ongoing or future talks.
A definite and unconditional obligation may qualify, even if technical or procedural details, including the exact implementation date, timeframe, or sequencing, remain subject to future arrangements, provided that the obligation still establishes a concrete, measurable benchmark against which compliance could be tested. Conditional obligations do not qualify.
Whether an instrument qualifies will be primarily determined by its officially released text. A qualifying instrument must be signed or formally adopted by both the United States and Iran by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. If such an instrument is signed or formally adopted by that time, but the complete text has not been released, and genuine material ambiguity remains as to whether it satisfies this market’s requirements, this market may remain open for up to 28 calendar days after the specified date pending release of the text. If the text has still not been released after 28 calendar days, official and definitive announcements from the United States or Iran, and a consensus of credible reporting, will be used to determine whether the instrument qualifies.
An instrument to which parties other than the United States and Iran are also party will qualify, provided that both the United States and Iran are parties to the instrument and all other requirements are satisfied.
Once a diplomatic instrument has been signed or formally adopted without signature by both the United States and Iran and confirmed to satisfy the requirements of a qualifying written diplomatic instrument, this market’s condition is met, regardless of whether the instrument later enters into force, is ratified, receives legislative or treaty consent, or is subsequently repudiated, withdrawn from, or not implemented by the United States or Iran.
The primary resolution sources for this market will be official communications from the governments of the United States and Iran, or their authorized representatives. A consensus of credible reporting from major news agencies of record may also be used.
Related markets
See all outcomes for US-Iran Final Nuclear Deal — the full event, with combined odds and signal timeline.