US-Iran Final Nuclear DealNovember 30

OpenVol$140KDeadlineas of

Odds now

The market prices a 8% chance that this market resolves YES, as of .

YES8¢
NO93¢

24has of

What moved the odds?

18 AI-matched news signals on this market, newest first. Entry price is the called side when the news hit; the signed return marks it against the live price as of .

Foreign media: Talks mediated by Qatar between the United States and Iran have made little progress, with both sides refusing to make concessions and fears of renewed fighting growing. Qatar proposed an agreement linking Iran's demand for the lifting of the US naval blockade to US demands for nuclear concessions. But Iran said it would not consider taking nuclear steps unless Washington returned to the memorandum of understanding signed in June. US officials initially described the talks as positive, saying Trump was open to easing sanctions and releasing frozen funds in exchange for nuclear concessions. Hours later, Trump said he had offered nothing to Iran. A source told Axios that the talks were "stalled," while Trump said on Tuesday that Iran would "surrender" and "will not have a nuclear weapon."
NOalhadath95%match91¢+1%
Amid concerns about a resumption of war after November 3rd, Iranian pessimism grows behind closed doors following Trump's rejection of the 7-day proposal. Iranian officials have expressed pessimism in private meetings regarding the possibility of reaching an agreement with the US to end the war before the midterm elections. According to Bloomberg, citing informed sources, talks held on the sidelines of the UN meetings in New York have not made any tangible progress. Iranian pessimism has increased after Trump rejected the 7-day proposal to open the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for lifting the naval blockade and oil sanctions. Iran anticipates an escalation of the military and economic conflict after the midterm elections on November 3rd.
NOalarabiya95%match91¢+1%
Amid concerns about a resumption of war after November 3rd, Iranian pessimism grows behind closed doors following Trump's rejection of the 7-day proposal. Iranian officials have expressed pessimism in private meetings regarding the possibility of reaching an agreement with the US to end the war before the midterm elections. According to Bloomberg, citing informed sources, talks held on the sidelines of the UN meetings in New York have not made any tangible progress. Iranian pessimism has increased after Trump rejected the 7-day proposal to open the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for lifting the naval blockade and oil sanctions. Iran anticipates an escalation of the military and economic conflict after the midterm elections on November 3rd.
NOBloomberg Reporter97%match91¢+1%
Top story on Bloomberg tonight: • • Iranian officials have privately expressed pessimism about reaching a deal to end hostilities with the US and reopen the Strait of Hormuz before the midterm elections in November, according to people familiar with the matter. • • Iran and the US made little progress during talks in New York at the United Nations General Assembly last week and Iran believes there’s a high chance of the conflict escalating after the Nov. 3 vote, according to the people, some of whom were briefed by Iranian officials. • • The main mediators are seeking something different from the Memorandum of Understanding signed by Iran and the US in mid-June. • • The US has told mediators it wants Iran to make firm commitments on reopening the strait this time around and to make concessions regarding its nuclear program, two of the people said. • • Iran officials have consistently said they are willing to pursue diplomacy but do not trust Donald Trump to abide by the terms of any agreement. The White House has similar feelings of distrust toward Tehran and Trump has previously said he doubts any deal can be reached before the midterms. • • There will not be a deal with Iran unless issues regarding the country’s nuclear program are addressed, according to one US official. Trump is willing to give Iran sanctions relief and release frozen funds in exchange for concrete progress on nuclear, the official said. • • With @FionamMacDonald @S_Elwardany @SamyAdghirni:
NOKan Reporter97%match89¢+3%
Iranian officials have been privately pessimistic about reaching a deal that would end the aggression with Washington and reopen the Strait of Hormuz before the November midterm elections, people familiar with the matter told Bloomberg. According to the people, some of whom were briefed by Iranian officials, little progress was made between the two countries during talks in New York on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly last week, and the Islamic Republic believes there is a high chance that the conflict will escalate after the November 3 elections. @ishayb2003
NOsubscriber.politicopro.com93%match91¢+1%
Waltz says Iran wanted sanctions relief up front in rejected deal Mike Waltz, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said Sunday that PresidentDonald Trumprejected Iran’s latest proposal because Tehran wanted sanctions relief and access to “billions in frozen assets” before negotiating an end to its nuclear program. “They were asking for everything up front, with a promise that they would then talk,”Waltzsaid on CNN’s “State of the Union” when asked whatTrumpobjected to. On Saturday,Trumprejected an Iranian proposalto reopen the Strait of Hormuz and resume nuclear talks in exchange for the U.S. lifting its naval blockade of Iranian ports, waiving sanctions on Iranian oil sales and committing to a seven-day ceasefire that would include Lebanon. “They wanna make a deal where they open the Strait immediately because they’re losing so badly,”Trumptold reporters. “We’re winning tremendously. We have total control of the Hormuz Strait.” The Wall Street Journal reported Friday, citing U.S. officials, thatTrumphas told aides he expected to resume bombing Iran after the November midterms. Asked about the report,Waltzsaid, “I don’t think that the president has said that himself; that’s some reporting by a newspaper.” “What the president has said and said here at his U.N. speech was that the Iranians are miscalculating that he’s taking into account politics here,”Waltzadded. This comes as the war in Iran and rising gas prices put pressure on Republicans ahead of the November midterms.
NORussian state TV93%match91¢+1%
Donald Trump publicly rejected Iran's plan to end hostilities within seven days. Earlier, The Wall Street Journal reported that the president told his aides that the United States could resume strikes against Iran after the November congressional elections. The day before, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that Tehran had presented Washington with a plan to end hostilities within seven days.
NON13/GLZ Reporters93%match91¢+1%
On the same subject, an American source tells the Saudi Al-Hadath network: Trump believes that economic pressure on Iran is more beneficial than reaching an agreement on the terms Iran has proposed. Trump has informed the negotiating team that there is no way back to the memorandum of understanding with Iran (which was signed in mid-June and fell apart a month later). Trump is inclined to renew airstrikes on Iran after the US midterm elections (in early November), while tightening the embargo on it. [in reply to: President Trump announces: Rejects Iranian proposal This is a proposal to open the naval blockade of Hormuz within 7 days and lift sanctions on Iran, in exchange for a cessation of hostilities (both in Iran and Lebanon)]
NOUkrainian Media94%match91¢+1%
Trump promised to make a deal with Iran immediately after the midterm elections to Congress in November Donald Trump said this during a speech at the UN General Assembly in New York: I need to make a decision on Iran - make a deal that will allow them to become the greatest country in the world, or I will eliminate the Islamic Republic, sending them to hell, without giving them a chance to survive. Trump added that he offered Tehran "full economic cooperation" in exchange for ending their nuclear program and ending their support for terrorism, but they refused, which was a "big mistake." He also noted that Iran wanted to create a nuclear bomb and created a missile capable of reaching Europe, and accused the ayatollah regime of killing more than 72 thousand of its own citizens during the unrest at the beginning of this of the year. Watch the live broadcast on News.LIVE — speeches by world leaders and key statements about Ukraine.
NOalarabiya92%match95¢-3%
Trump predicts the end of the Iran war after the November election, saying the situation there is "stuck" and it faces deep problems.
NOReuters Reporter94%match95¢-3%
Sept 10 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said he expected the war with Iran to end after the November U.S. midterm elections and threatened again to attack a site associated with the Islamic Republic's nuclear programme.
NORussian state TV93%match95¢-3%
The US war with Iran will end after the November midterm elections to the US Congress, because Tehran "cannot hold out any longer," Trump claims. He also told reporters that the US military has destroyed nine Iranian ships, and the strikes will continue: "You'll see a lot more."
NORussian Media91%match93¢-1%
Iran is hoping to use the upcoming US elections to increase pressure on President Donald Trump and secure more favorable terms in the conflict, The Wall Street Journal reports. Tehran used a similar tactic in 1980, when the release of American hostages was delayed until Ronald Reagan's victory. Now, Iranian leaders are taking into account the unpopularity of the war in the US, including due to rising gas prices. According to Ellie Geranmayeh, an Iran expert at the European Council on Foreign Relations, Tehran may believe that it is not worth easing the pressure on Trump before the midterm elections in November. "As the clock starts ticking, the prevailing attitude in Tehran is: 'Why should we ease the pressure on Trump to make concessions? Let's make him feel the pain at the elections," Geranmaye said. RBK Channel on Max RBK App for iOS and Android
NOmoney.udn.com93%match89¢+3%
The 60-day negotiation period has expired, but the differences between the US and Iran remain unresolved. Trump says he will not seek an extension.
NOiranintl92%match89¢+3%
Esmail Baghaei, spokesman for the Islamic Republic's Foreign Ministry, said that the Islamabad memorandum of understanding did not have a 60-day deadline and that issues including the nuclear file were to be negotiated within a 60-day period. He added that these talks did not begin due to "gross and widespread violations" by the United States, and as a result, the issue of the 60-day period was also ruled out.
NOaljazeera.com94%match89¢+3%
Live: Iran says 60-day deadline ‘entirely moot’ after US violated memorandum
NOiranintl92%match89¢+3%
Ismail Baghaei, spokesman for the Islamic Republic's Foreign Ministry, announced in a press conference on Monday, August 16, that "there is no such thing as a 60-day deadline" in the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding. Bagaei said: "The Islamic Republic does not make decisions based on ultimatums and deadlines, and we were supposed to negotiate issues such as the nuclear file within 60 days, but given the US's violation of the Memorandum of Understanding, the 60-day discussion is no longer relevant." The spokesman for the Islamic Republic's Foreign Ministry added: "Due to the US's gross and widespread violation of the Memorandum of Understanding of June 18," no talks began just a few weeks after it was signed, and as a result, the discussion of the 60-day deadline has completely lost its relevance.
NOyomiuri.co.jp94%match89¢+3%
The US-Iran "memorandum of understanding" is set to expire in 60 days... but no substantive negotiations on the nuclear issue have taken place, and there are no moves to extend the deadline.

Where does the news lean?

3YES63NO30neutraltrailing 24h

Signal flow leans NO at 77% — signal sentiment, not the market price. Average match confidence across the listed signals: 94%.

What would make this resolve YES?

On June 14, 2026, the United States and Iran announced a written diplomatic agreement, including a 60-day extendable period in which both countries committed to negotiate toward a “final deal” regarding Iran’s nuclear program and other topics. This market resolves to “Yes” if a qualifying written diplomatic instrument between the United States and Iran has been mutually signed or adopted by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market resolves to “No.” Unless the written instrument is formally adopted without signature as described below, the instrument must be signed by both the United States and Iran. Both parties must either sign the same document or sign individual documents that substantively and directly indicate acceptance of the same underlying instrument, regardless of minor formatting, wording, or translation differences between the signed versions. Both physical signatures and officially-issued electronic signatures will qualify as signatures. If the written instrument is recognized by the United States and Iran as not requiring signature for execution, formal adoption of the instrument by both countries without signature will qualify. Formal adoption may be established by official actions, including: (i) an official joint statement announcing that the United States and Iran have adopted, approved, executed, concluded, or otherwise finalized the instrument; (ii) mutual official confirmation that the same published instrument has been agreed to, adopted, approved, executed, or concluded by both countries; (iii) adoption, approval, or endorsement through an official resolution, ministerial decision, executive decision, or equivalent institutional act, where that act is the mechanism by which the relevant country adopts the instrument; or (iv) an exchange of official diplomatic notes or letters confirming acceptance of the same instrument. A qualifying written diplomatic instrument must: (i) Be identified as the final deal contemplated by the June 14, 2026, memorandum of understanding, either in official United States or Iranian communications, or by a consensus of credible reporting; (ii) Establish at least one specific obligation limiting Iran's nuclear program through a concrete, measurable benchmark against which compliance could be tested, which may take the form of a defined limit, prohibition, or quantity (e.g., a specific cap on the purity level to which Iran may enrich uranium, or an explicit commitment for Iran to surrender, destroy, or dilute its enriched uranium stockpile). Non-specific or vague restrictions, with no defined metric (e.g., a pledge not to pursue nuclear weapons, a commitment to maintain the status quo, or an agreement to abide IAEA monitoring or inspections requirements that do not specifically restrict Iran’s nuclear program) will not qualify. The content of the qualifying instrument must be expressed as an agreed obligation to be implemented. The following do not qualify: (i) a provision the substantive obligation of which remains explicitly subject to a future agreement, negotiation process, or mutually agreed follow-on instrument; (ii) a provision explicitly framed as a minimum requirement for a future negotiation, rather than a present obligation; (iii) a floor, placeholder, or minimum standard established explicitly for the purpose of structuring ongoing or future talks. A definite and unconditional obligation may qualify, even if technical or procedural details, including the exact implementation date, timeframe, or sequencing, remain subject to future arrangements, provided that the obligation still establishes a concrete, measurable benchmark against which compliance could be tested. Conditional obligations do not qualify. Whether an instrument qualifies will be primarily determined by its officially released text. A qualifying instrument must be signed or formally adopted by both the United States and Iran by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. If such an instrument is signed or formally adopted by that time, but the complete text has not been released, and genuine material ambiguity remains as to whether it satisfies this market’s requirements, this market may remain open for up to 28 calendar days after the specified date pending release of the text. If the text has still not been released after 28 calendar days, official and definitive announcements from the United States or Iran, and a consensus of credible reporting, will be used to determine whether the instrument qualifies. An instrument to which parties other than the United States and Iran are also party will qualify, provided that both the United States and Iran are parties to the instrument and all other requirements are satisfied. Once a diplomatic instrument has been signed or formally adopted without signature by both the United States and Iran and confirmed to satisfy the requirements of a qualifying written diplomatic instrument, this market’s condition is met, regardless of whether the instrument later enters into force, is ratified, receives legislative or treaty consent, or is subsequently repudiated, withdrawn from, or not implemented by the United States or Iran. The primary resolution sources for this market will be official communications from the governments of the United States and Iran, or their authorized representatives. A consensus of credible reporting from major news agencies of record may also be used.

Related markets

See all outcomes for US-Iran Final Nuclear Deal — the full event, with combined odds and signal timeline.

Trending now