US-Iran Final Nuclear DealJuly 31
ResolvedOutcome: No$1.4Mas of
Odds now
This market has resolved No. Final market pricing put YES at 0%, as of .
YES0¢
NO100¢
as of
What moved the odds?
32 AI-matched news signals on this market, newest first. Entry price is the called side when the news hit; the signed return marks it against the final price as of .
ISNA: Pakistan and Qatar presented a joint proposal on Monday, calling on Iran and the United States to return to their positions before July 9 as a first step to resuming negotiations. @IRIBNEWS_COM
ISNA: Pakistan and Qatar presented a joint proposal on Monday, calling on Iran and the United States to return to their positions before July 9 as a first step towards resuming negotiations.
Meeting of the Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs with the media, Monday, July 19, 2021, answer to the thirty-first and final question: We will leave the internal disputes and debates of the United States to themselves. The performance of the US government is important to us, as they have failed to fulfill their commitments in this particular matter. Another point is that there is no doubt about the malice of the Zionist regime. The Zionist regime has not only not supported any process that could create the slightest hope of establishing stability and security in our region, but has also always been on the lookout for an opportunity to sabotage diplomatic processes. Both our region knows this and certainly American public opinion knows this. But in essence, it makes no difference. Every government is responsible for its own behavior and must have the ability and will to fulfill its commitments, regardless of forces that seek to sabotage a process. @MFAIran [in reply to: Meeting of the Spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs with the media, Monday, July 19, 2021, Question 31 and final: J.D. Vance, Trump's first vice president, has announced that a large-budget campaign is trying to derail the negotiations and destroy the agreement, and this campaign is supported by Israel. Don't these statements indicate a division between the United States and Israel over negotiations with Iran? Also, what do you think of Israel's role in violating the promises made by the United States in the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding? @MFAIran]
Live: Iran leaders likely to walk away from US deal after deadly attacks
Live: US is pessimistic over prospects of Iran nuclear deal: WSJ
U.S. military launches new Iran strikes as Trump says 'not sure' he wants deal
Trump: "We made a deal with Iran, but the Iranians acted as if we hadn't agreed to anything."
Live: Iran vows it 'won't fold' after accusing US of violating agreement
The march towards a final nuclear deal continues to go…backwards. • • US revokes oil sanctions waiver after Iran Strait attacks. • •
JD Vance said that after "Operation Epic Fury," the United States is now negotiating with the Islamic Republic from a position of strength. The White House deputy spokesman also said that the United States has paved the way for the Islamic Republic's nuclear disarmament and has completely destroyed Tehran's military and missile capabilities. Interview with Amir Giti, a member of the editorial board of Iran International
Live: How war on Iran changed the global energy sector forever
Emad Gad, advisor at the Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies: Ambiguity prevails in the Iran-US agreement... and no contentious issue has been resolved.
US may try to persuade Iran with transit fees; nuclear issue remains unresolved in working-level talks between the two countries.
Qatari Foreign Ministry spokesman Majid Al-Ansari announced that Qatari and Pakistani mediators in Doha met separately with US and Iranian negotiators and that positive progress had been made in the talks. He said that the continuation of the talks had been postponed until after the funeral of Ali Khamenei.
Qatari and Pakistani mediators concluded separate meetings today in Doha with US and Iranian negotiators, making positive progress on issues related to the memorandum of understanding signed in Islamabad, based on the outcomes of the Lucerne Summit. The parties agreed to continue discussions in the coming period, with the next meeting to be scheduled as soon as possible after the conclusion of the funeral processions for the former Iranian Supreme Leader.
US, Iran agree to one-week de-escalation in Strait of Hormuz ahead of America 250 celebrations
Conversation - Continued violations of war-ending MoU with Iran prove US cannot be trusted: Analyst • •
"Parties gave 60 days to reach a comprehensive nuclear deal, but 2 wks into that window, they're still arguing over terms of the MOU they already signed. Currently, collapse of that initial deal looks more likely than agreement on a final one." @BarakRavid
Iran "Qatar talks conclude... Agrees to establish channel for reporting Memorandum of Understanding violations"
Live: Iran claims $6B frozen funds to be unlocked as Qatar talks create new US communication channel
Iran says the US violated commitments made in the memorandum of understanding and will establish a monitoring mechanism to review violations.
Political analyst Ayed Al-Manna: Iran has been obstructing the implementation of the memorandum of understanding since day one, exploiting Trump's desire to avoid a return to war and the desire of regional states for stability.
Al-Hadath correspondent Abdullah Khalouf: The Strait of Hormuz is the focus of indirect talks in Qatar between the US and Iran... and mediators have convinced Tehran to postpone the remaining issues to future rounds of negotiations.
Axios: The collapse of the 60-day deadline for a comprehensive nuclear agreement between the US and Iran is more likely than reaching a final agreement. #Breaking #Here_is_the_Kingdom
Details of today's talks in Doha/Gharibabadi: A meeting was held with officials from the Central Bank of Qatar Deputy Foreign Minister:
The Iranian delegation's talks began this morning (Wednesday, July 10) with the Prime Minister and the Foreign Minister, and then the delegations of the three countries of Iran, Qatar, and Pakistan held two meetings.
The first meeting of the Monitoring Group on the Implementation of the Memorandum of Understanding was also held with the presence of senior negotiators from the three countries, and the Iranian delegation raised and examined the US's violation of its obligations under Article 1 of the Memorandum of Understanding regarding the end of the war in Lebanon, the news published regarding US actions regarding the reinforcement of equipment and forces in the region, and some threatening and interventionist statements by the country's officials. The Iranian delegation noted that the commitments of the memorandum of understanding are an integrated set and cannot be seen in isolation.
It was decided that the monitoring group's immediate communication channel will also be established by tomorrow and the shortcomings of the memorandum of understanding will be officially and documented, and they will be discussed, reviewed, and decided on."
In meetings with Qatari officials, including the Central Bank, some issues related to the cost of part of the initial six billion dollars were examined, and it was decided that the necessary goods would be purchased and made available to Iran in accordance with the declared needs of our country.
No meeting was held between the Iranian and American delegations in Doha.
IRNA @IRIBNEWS_COM
Iran: Gharibabadi: The Iranian delegation indicated that the commitments contained in the memorandum of understanding are a single package and cannot be viewed separately.
Iran Report: Talks with Pakistani and Qatari mediators in Doha have ended
Iran announces end of Qatar talks
Vance: Indirect talks between the US and Iran are progressing well; discussions on the nuclear issue will begin soon.
Trump says U.S. and Iran will meet to negotiate after days of strikes
Iran's senior negotiator denies new round of talks with U.S. scheduled
Donald Trump wrote in a post: "Iran has requested a meeting. (This meeting) will be in Doha tomorrow.” Previously, Kazem Gharibabadi, head of the Islamic Republic’s technical negotiating team, denied some media reports that Tehran and Washington planned to hold talks on Tuesday. Kazem Gharibabadi, head of Iran’s technical negotiating team, said today: “Although consultations with Qatar, including on following up on the implementation of the other party’s commitments, are ongoing as usual, the news from some media outlets that technical talks by the working groups will be held in Doha cannot be confirmed.” He continued by saying that “the first round of technical talks within the framework of the designated working groups will be held when conditions are met and after an agreement is reached on its date and location, and consultations in this regard are continuing through the intermediary countries.”
@VahidHeadline
“Caroline Leavitt,” White House spokeswoman, announced on Monday, July 28, 1405, that “Steve Whittock,” the US President’s special representative on Middle East affairs, and Jared Kushner, former White House senior adviser and informal adviser to Donald Trump on Middle East affairs, will attend the Doha meeting with representatives of the Islamic Republic on Tuesday. @VahidHeadline @VahidOnline
Where does the news lean?
8YES47NO10neutraltrailing 24h
Average match confidence across the listed signals: 98%.
How did this market resolve?
On June 14, 2026, the United States and Iran announced a written diplomatic agreement, including a 60-day extendable period in which both countries committed to negotiate toward a “final deal” regarding Iran’s nuclear program and other topics.
This market resolves to “Yes” if a qualifying written diplomatic instrument between the United States and Iran has been mutually signed or adopted by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market resolves to “No.”
Unless the written instrument is formally adopted without signature as described below, the instrument must be signed by both the United States and Iran. Both parties must either sign the same document or sign individual documents that substantively and directly indicate acceptance of the same underlying instrument, regardless of minor formatting, wording, or translation differences between the signed versions. Both physical signatures and officially-issued electronic signatures will qualify as signatures.
If the written instrument is recognized by the United States and Iran as not requiring signature for execution, formal adoption of the instrument by both countries without signature will qualify. Formal adoption may be established by official actions, including:
(i) an official joint statement announcing that the United States and Iran have adopted, approved, executed, concluded, or otherwise finalized the instrument;
(ii) mutual official confirmation that the same published instrument has been agreed to, adopted, approved, executed, or concluded by both countries;
(iii) adoption, approval, or endorsement through an official resolution, ministerial decision, executive decision, or equivalent institutional act, where that act is the mechanism by which the relevant country adopts the instrument; or
(iv) an exchange of official diplomatic notes or letters confirming acceptance of the same instrument.
A qualifying written diplomatic instrument must:
(i) Be identified as the final deal contemplated by the June 14, 2026, memorandum of understanding, either in official United States or Iranian communications, or by a consensus of credible reporting;
(ii) Establish at least one specific obligation limiting Iran's nuclear program through a concrete, measurable benchmark against which compliance could be tested, which may take the form of a defined limit, prohibition, or quantity (e.g., a specific cap on the purity level to which Iran may enrich uranium, or an explicit commitment for Iran to surrender, destroy, or dilute its enriched uranium stockpile). Non-specific or vague restrictions, with no defined metric (e.g., a pledge not to pursue nuclear weapons, a commitment to maintain the status quo, or an agreement to abide IAEA monitoring or inspections requirements that do not specifically restrict Iran’s nuclear program) will not qualify.
The content of the qualifying instrument must be expressed as an agreed obligation to be implemented. The following do not qualify:
(i) a provision the substantive obligation of which remains explicitly subject to a future agreement, negotiation process, or mutually agreed follow-on instrument;
(ii) a provision explicitly framed as a minimum requirement for a future negotiation, rather than a present obligation;
(iii) a floor, placeholder, or minimum standard established explicitly for the purpose of structuring ongoing or future talks.
A definite and unconditional obligation may qualify, even if technical or procedural details, including the exact implementation date, timeframe, or sequencing, remain subject to future arrangements, provided that the obligation still establishes a concrete, measurable benchmark against which compliance could be tested. Conditional obligations do not qualify.
Whether an instrument qualifies will be primarily determined by its officially released text. A qualifying instrument must be signed or formally adopted by both the United States and Iran by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. If such an instrument is signed or formally adopted by that time, but the complete text has not been released, and genuine material ambiguity remains as to whether it satisfies this market’s requirements, this market may remain open for up to 28 calendar days after the specified date pending release of the text. If the text has still not been released after 28 calendar days, official and definitive announcements from the United States or Iran, and a consensus of credible reporting, will be used to determine whether the instrument qualifies.
An instrument to which parties other than the United States and Iran are also party will qualify, provided that both the United States and Iran are parties to the instrument and all other requirements are satisfied.
Once a diplomatic instrument has been signed or formally adopted without signature by both the United States and Iran and confirmed to satisfy the requirements of a qualifying written diplomatic instrument, this market’s condition is met, regardless of whether the instrument later enters into force, is ratified, receives legislative or treaty consent, or is subsequently repudiated, withdrawn from, or not implemented by the United States or Iran.
The primary resolution sources for this market will be official communications from the governments of the United States and Iran, or their authorized representatives. A consensus of credible reporting from major news agencies of record may also be used.
Related markets
See all outcomes for US-Iran Final Nuclear Deal — the full event, with combined odds and signal timeline.