What will be in a US-Iran deal in 2026?Uranium Enrichment % Cap (1+ Year)
Open$221Kas of
Odds now
The market prices a 14% chance that this market resolves YES, as of .
YES14¢
NO87¢
as of
What moved the odds?
8 AI-matched news signals on this market, newest first. Entry price is the called side when the news hit; the signed return marks it against the live price as of .
Eslami, Head of the Atomic Energy Organization: “We will not give up the right to enrich and we will not hand over uranium.” A few important points about the statement made by the head of the country’s atomic energy:
1. Eslami, the head of the Atomic Energy Organization, who is now also one of the options for the Ministry of Oil, has fired a salvo for those who are seeking an agreement in the Iran-US negotiations; the main red line and breaking point for America - and especially Israel - is “zeroing Iran’s enrichment capacity,” “halting Iran’s will to enrich,” and also “failing to withdraw 400 kilos of 60% uranium.”
2. If America withdraws even 1% from this war with a symbolic bombing - which I personally find unthinkable with this volume of military equipment being sent to the region by America - Israel will not tolerate Iran’s right to enrich and also the failure to withdraw uranium from Iran. Especially since Iran will have the excuse and evidence to move towards a nuclear military dimension with the last two wars.
3. The Americans claim that they took control of at least part of the strait and reduced the importance of the Strait of Hormuz from the south of the strait and part of it in the territory of the Emirates (a 480-meter waterway dredged by the Emirates and used by small oil ships), and in negotiations with Iran, nuclear energy must definitely be on the table and an agreement must be reached on it, as Trump intends.
4. Special inspections of Iran's new facilities by the United States are also not rational; a part of Iran's nuclear facilities that did not have a single particle of contamination was also targeted in the last two wars; the inspections of Fordow and Kalang are also for a new war and not to verify Iran's will.
5. Despite the efforts of some - which were arbitrarily made to bring Iran into the nuclear military dimension - the leadership of the revolutionary martyrs were not satisfied with the atomic bomb until the moment of their martyrdom. Iran paid the ultimate price for having a nuclear weapon but did not build it; whether it was right or wrong will be determined in the future.
IRAN REFUSES TO ABANDON URANIUM ENRICHMENT • • Iran's atomic energy chief Mohammad Eslami says Tehran will not abandon its nuclear enrichment program, insisting it remains a national right. • • The statement follows U.S. Vice President JD Vance's demand for meaningful reductions in Iran's enrichment capacity as a condition for a nuclear deal. • • Although Iran is reportedly not currently enriching uranium, the IAEA estimates roughly 200 kg of enriched uranium may remain at Isfahan. • • Tehran maintains its nuclear activities comply with international safeguards.
From @Reuters via @TimesofIsrael: • • “Iran will not abandon uranium enrichment or hand over its uranium, state media reports, citing the head of the country’s Atomic Energy Organization Mohammad Eslami. • • Dismissing renewed US threats against Iran’s nuclear facilities as ‘nothing new,’ Eslami says enrichment was ‘an inseparable part’ of the nuclear process.” • • The United States, Israel and our Gulf allies would love nothing more than for the IRGC rump regime to abandon its plans for nuclear weapons and the conventional missile arsenal to defend those weapons. • • But the rump regime will not do that. So the battle will go even though Iran is defeated. As with the death rattles of Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, the same fanatical wheezing of threats and bluster —and the occasional missile fusillade— will continue until the regime collapses because it must. A modern nation state cannot long endure in the situation the Islamic Republic is in. Very dangerous but also defeated.
Live: Iran says it won’t give up uranium enrichment or surrender stockpiles
Mohammad Eslami, head of the Atomic Energy Organization of the Islamic Republic of Iran, announced in a conversation with reporters that Iran will not give up its right to enrich uranium and will not hand over its enriched uranium. In response to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio's statements about the Islamic Republic's loss of the opportunity for a nuclear deal, he said: "Their statements are out of desperation and nuclear negotiations were not on the agenda at all." Eslami also said that the Islamic Republic's nuclear program is "completely clear and within the framework of safeguards" and that Israel has been "buzzing" about it for 25 years. In response to a question about the possibility of Tehran abandoning enrichment, he emphasized: "Absolutely not. Enrichment is an integral part of nuclear technology."
Araqchi: Enrichment to 60% is not illegal This action is still within the framework of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and our peaceful nuclear program. We have done this for specific purposes, including medical purposes and some other purposes. But in 2025 and also in 2026, we proposed an agreement on our 60% material, and still, if they show their good faith and real determination for peace, this issue can be considered. We decided to postpone all nuclear issues to later stages and at this stage, focus on confidence-building. That is why we have presented this seven-day plan; a plan that is based on the understandings we had with the American negotiating parties in the past. First, trust must be built. Our funds that have been illegally frozen must be released. The blockade must be lifted. And other measures that they themselves know they must take. @YjcNewsChannel [in reply to: Araqchi: According to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), we are a committed member of this treaty. But my question is whether 60% enrichment is illegal or not? In previous negotiations, we have addressed all the concerns raised in this regard. If such a question still exists, then why did they attack us? Are they allowed to bomb anything that they consider illegal? Is there any justification for such an action? War is not the solution. This was a matter for negotiation and we have negotiated it in the past. We have enriched uranium to 60% for peaceful purposes and this action is within the framework of our obligations in the NPT. We have not violated the NPT. Yes, there are questions. We have answered these questions in the past, during negotiations, and we can do so again. There is no need for military action. @YjcNewsChannel]
Live: Pezeshkian said Iran did not want a nuclear weapon but would not accept limitations on its civilian nuclear program. Iran's nuclear program has been at the heart of the standoff between Tehran and Washington. Iran insists that any deal must allow it to enrich uranium to the levels needed for use in medical research and electricity. Washington opposes any enrichment.
IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL ODDS COLLAPSE • • Prediction markets are turning sharply more skeptical on a U.S.-Iran nuclear deal. • • Kalshi now prices the odds at just 13% by March 2027, 16% by January 2028, and 15% by January 2029 — all falling sharply in recent weeks. •
Where does the news lean?
0YES16NO15neutraltrailing 24h
Signal flow leans NO at 86% — signal sentiment, not the market price. Average match confidence across the listed signals: 94%.
What would make this resolve YES?
This market resolves to “Yes” if a written diplomatic instrument between the United States and Iran that establishes a specific, percentage cap on the purity level to which Iran may enrich uranium, committed to for at least one year, has been mutually signed or otherwise formally adopted by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market resolves to “No.”
The instrument must specifically include a percentage cap that operates as a general ceiling on the level to which Iran may enrich uranium for any purpose. Vague, or non-specific language regarding the level of Iranian uranium enrichment which does not establish a specific percentage-cap ceiling on all Iranian enrichment (e.g., “lower levels”, “civilian grade”, “maintain the status quo”) will not qualify. Caps that directly mandate a specific percentage cap on enrichment through reference to a publicly-recognized benchmark percentage (e.g., JCPOA-levels), however, will qualify, even if they do not specifically reference the relevant numeric percentage itself. An Iranian commitment to end all enrichment of uranium qualifies as a cap, as it establishes a 0% cap on Iranian uranium enrichment.
A qualifying enrichment cap must be committed for a period of at least one year. A permanent enrichment cap will qualify. An enrichment cap with no specified end date will qualify unless explicitly framed as short-term, provisional, or temporary (e.g., a commitment not to enrich uranium while the exact implementation terms of the instrument are being finalized would not qualify). A cap committed to for less than one year will not qualify, even if framed as permitting extension.
The enrichment cap must be expressed as a presently-agreed obligation to be implemented. A presently-agreed obligation to such an enrichment cap will qualify, even if technical or procedural details, including the implementation schedule or specific monitoring requirements, remain subject to future arrangements. A conditional commitment the substantive obligation of which remains explicitly subject to a future agreement, negotiation process, or mutually agreed follow-on instrument (e.g., a commitment to agree upon an enrichment cap in a future agreement) will not qualify. A commitment explicitly framed as a minimum requirement for a future negotiation, rather than a present obligation, will not qualify.
Unless the written instrument is formally adopted without signature as described below, the instrument must be signed by both the United States and Iran. Both parties must either sign the same document or sign individual documents that substantively and directly indicate acceptance of the same underlying instrument, regardless of minor formatting, wording, or translation differences between the signed versions. Both physical signatures and officially-issued electronic signatures will qualify as signatures.
If the written instrument is recognized by the United States and Iran as not requiring signature for execution, formal adoption of the instrument by both countries without signature will qualify. Formal adoption may be established by official actions, including:
(i) an official joint statement announcing that the United States and Iran have adopted, approved, executed, concluded, or otherwise finalized the instrument;
(ii) mutual official confirmation that the same published instrument has been agreed to, adopted, approved, executed, or concluded by both countries;
(iii) adoption, approval, or endorsement through an official resolution, ministerial decision, executive decision, or equivalent institutional act, where that act is the mechanism by which the relevant country adopts the instrument; or
(iv) an exchange of official diplomatic notes or letters confirming acceptance of the same instrument.
Whether an instrument qualifies will be primarily determined by its officially released text. A qualifying instrument must be signed or formally adopted by both the United States and Iran by the specified date, 11:59 PM ET. If an instrument is signed or formally adopted by that time, but the complete text has not been released, and genuine material ambiguity remains as to whether it satisfies this market’s requirements, this market may remain open for up to 28 calendar days after the specified date pending release of the text. If the text has still not been released after 28 calendar days, official and definitive announcements from the United States or Iran, and a consensus of credible reporting, will be used to determine whether the instrument qualifies.
An instrument to which parties other than the United States and Iran are also party will qualify, provided that both the United States and Iran are parties to the instrument and all other requirements are satisfied.
Once a diplomatic instrument has been signed or formally adopted without signature by both the United States and Iran and confirmed to satisfy the requirements of a qualifying written diplomatic instrument, this market’s condition is met, regardless of whether the instrument later enters into force, is ratified, receives legislative or treaty consent, or is subsequently repudiated, withdrawn from, or not implemented by the United States or Iran.
The primary resolution sources for this market will be official communications from the governments of the United States and Iran, or their authorized representatives. A consensus of credible reporting from major news agencies of record may also be used.
Related markets
See all outcomes for What will be in a US-Iran deal in 2026? — the full event, with combined odds and signal timeline.
- Israel accuses Iran/proxies of plane stabbing incident by Oct 31?45
- Iran blockade lifted before Iran-Oman Hormuz agreement?12
- Strait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by December 31?6
- Strait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by October 31?5
- Strait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by November 30?5