Which countries will Trump accuse of election interference by July 16?Venezuela
ResolvedOutcome: No$12Kas of
Odds now
This market has resolved No. Final market pricing put YES at 0%, as of .
YES0¢
NO100¢
as of
What moved the odds?
4 AI-matched news signals on this market, newest first. Entry price is the called side when the news hit; the signed return marks it against the final price as of .
Trump claimed Thursday that newly declassified documents show Venezuela developed a method to secretly alter election results: •
Live: Trump claims declassified documents show Venezuela had undetectable vote-rigging methods
Live: It is notable that while President Trump used this speech to suggest American elections are vulnerable to being "rigged and stolen," he did not actually assert or provide any specific evidence that any vote was changed or altered in the 2020 election. He did claim that Venezuela's election was rigged in 2020, however.
Live: Trump has overstated — again — what the newly declassified documents say about Venezuela’s ability to rig vote counts. He asserted that a C.I.A. analysis of Venezuela’s use of voting technology allowed government officials to “digitally alter vote totals.” But in fact the documents are more circumspect.
Where does the news lean?
4YES1NO0neutraltrailing 24h
Average match confidence across the listed signals: 92%.
How did this market resolve?
This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump publicly alleges that interference by the listed country has occurred in any US election held after the 2016 US presidential election between market creation and July 16, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No".
Qualifying interference includes, but is not limited to: manipulation of vote tallies or voting machines; hacking of election infrastructure; casting of fraudulent ballots; coordinated disinformation or influence campaigns intended to alter the election's outcome; or illegal foreign funding of campaigns. Allegations limited to procedural irregularities, administrative errors, ordinary lobbying, legal foreign media coverage, or fraud of domestic or unspecified origin will not qualify.
The alleged interference must be attributed to the government of the listed country, a state-affiliated entity, organization, or nationals of the listed country acting in that capacity. The actor must be identified at least at the national level (e.g., "China," "Russian operatives," "Iranian hackers").
A qualifying statement must definitively allege that election interference occurred. Statements that are clearly satirical, hypothetical, or rhetorical will not qualify (e.g., "Did China interfere? Who knows," "If China interfered...", "They could easily interfere”).
A statement need not use the word "interference." Any phrasing that communicates the three elements above (e.g., "China stole the election," "Russia rigged the vote in Pennsylvania") will qualify.
Reposts, retweets, or shares of third-party content will qualify only if accompanied by original commentary from Trump that itself meets the criteria above, or if the repost includes an unambiguous endorsement of a qualifying claim (e.g., "TRUE!"). A bare repost without comment will not qualify.
Statements made by representatives will not alone qualify. Reports of private conversations, leaked audio not intended for public release, and secondhand accounts will not qualify.
Any public statement from the listed individual, written or verbal, will qualify. Speeches in which the listed individual begins speaking within the time frame of this market will qualify, even if their allegation falls outside the market’s timeframe.
The resolution source for this market will be public statements by Donald Trump.
Related markets
See all outcomes for Which countries will Trump accuse of election interference by July 16? — the full event, with combined odds and signal timeline.