IAEA visits Isfahan, Fordow, or Natanz nuclear site

Head of the Atomic Energy Organization: The Agency knows that it is not possible to visit a place where missiles have been fired and there is an active threat, and the Agency itself does not have instructions for inspection. The law of the Parliament does not allow cooperation with the Agency. However, the Agency has come to other centers besides the ones that were hit and inspected them. They are under pressure from the US and Israel to come and provide them with ground observations, but of course they will not achieve any results.

Head of the Atomic Energy Organization: The Agency knows that it is not possible to visit a place where missiles have been fired and there is an active threat, and the Agency itself does not have instructions for inspection. The law of the Parliament does not allow cooperation with the Agency. However, the Agency has come to other centers besides the ones that were hit and inspected them. They are under pressure from the US and Israel to come and provide them with ground observations, but of course they will not achieve any results.

Reza Najafi: The Islamic Republic's cooperation with the Agency continues, and inspectors are scheduled to go to Iran to inspect the Bushehr nuclear power plant, but access to the facilities that were targeted is contingent on the end of the fighting and ensuring that war does not break out again.

Reza Najafi: The Islamic Republic's cooperation with the Agency continues, and inspectors are scheduled to go to Iran to inspect the Bushehr nuclear power plant, but access to the facilities that were targeted is contingent on the end of the fighting and ensuring that war does not break out again.

The watchdog also highlighted a declared enrichment facility at Isfahan that it says Iran reported in 2025 but has never allowed inspectors to visit. The agency says it does not know the site's current safeguards status or whether nuclear material is present • 4/5

The watchdog also highlighted a declared enrichment facility at Isfahan that it says Iran reported in 2025 but has never allowed inspectors to visit. The agency says it does not know the site's current safeguards status or whether nuclear material is present • 4/5

New report: The IAEA has halted on-site verification at Iranian facilities since February... 440 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent remain unaccounted for, with Isfahan at the heart of the mystery.

New report: The IAEA has halted on-site verification at Iranian facilities since February... 440 kilograms of uranium enriched to 60 percent remain unaccounted for, with Isfahan at the heart of the mystery.

The New York Times reported that, according to an internal report by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Islamic Republic continues to block inspectors from accessing its nuclear facilities, and the agency is unable to verify the location and status of Iran’s stockpiles of weapons-grade uranium. The 11-page report was sent to member states ahead of a meeting of the IAEA’s Board of Governors in Vienna next week, which is expected to consider a new resolution condemning the Islamic Republic. According to the report, Iran had about 9,874.9 kilograms of enriched uranium as of June 12, of which 184.1 kilograms were enriched to 20 percent and 440.9 kilograms to 60 percent. The New York Times wrote that the agency is unsure of the exact location of some nuclear facilities and the materials they contain. The Islamic Republic has also not answered long-standing questions about its previous nuclear program and undeclared sites. According to the IAEA report, the Islamic Republic has promised to allow inspectors access to the Bushehr nuclear power plant later this month.

The International Atomic Energy Agency has not observed any change in Iran's enriched uranium stockpiles. International Atomic Energy Agency: Iran has still not allowed access to its declared fourth enrichment facility in Isfahan. The amount of Iran's enriched uranium stockpiles as of June 13, 2025 has not changed compared to previous reports. isna.ir/xdWZkZ @isna94

The International Atomic Energy Agency claims lack of access to Iran's nuclear sites The recent report by the International Atomic Energy Agency, making claims that there will be no access to the nuclear facilities in Isfahan and the damaged sites in June 2025, called for the agency's immediate verification of the Islamic Republic of Iran's nuclear activities. Read the full text in the link below... @Nournews_ir

The International Atomic Energy Agency claims lack of access to Iran's nuclear sites The recent report by the International Atomic Energy Agency, making claims that there will be no access to the nuclear facilities in Isfahan and the damaged sites in June 2025, called for the agency's immediate verification of the Islamic Republic of Iran's nuclear activities. Read the full text in the link below... @Nournews_ir

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is concerned that Iran has not granted the agency access to its fourth enrichment facility in Isfahan.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is concerned that Iran has not granted the agency access to its fourth enrichment facility in Isfahan.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is concerned that Iran has not granted the agency access to its fourth enrichment facility in Isfahan, and it is unknown whether the facility contains nuclear material.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is concerned that Iran has not granted the agency access to its fourth enrichment facility in Isfahan, and it is unknown whether the facility contains nuclear material.

The head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization: The International Atomic Energy Agency is insisting on visiting the affected sites under pressure from the United States and Israel, who want to know the effects of their military operation on those sites.

The head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization: The International Atomic Energy Agency is insisting on visiting the affected sites under pressure from the United States and Israel, who want to know the effects of their military operation on those sites.

The head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization: The International Atomic Energy Agency is insisting on visiting the damaged sites under pressure from the United States and Israel, who want to know the effects of their military operation on those sites.

The head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization: The International Atomic Energy Agency is insisting on visiting the damaged sites under pressure from the United States and Israel, who want to know the effects of their military operation on those sites.

Head of the Atomic Energy Organization of #Iran: Washington and Tel Aviv are pressuring the Agency to visit the damaged sites with the aim of assessing the results of their own military operations. According to the law of the parliament, inspections of these centers are not accepted until the necessary security regulations and protocols are developed. The undamaged sites have been inspected according to safeguards

Head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Mohammad Eslami: The IAEA cannot demand to inspect sites that were subjected to military aggression unless the special protocols are adopted. The IAEA must clarify its position regarding the security status of Iranian sites that were subjected to military aggression. There is American and Israeli pressure on the IAEA to visit the destroyed sites to find out what happened to them after the military aggression. Iran is still in a state of war, and its nuclear sites have not been secured for inspection. International organizations have become mere tools in the hands of the colonial system, American arrogance, and Zionism. The IAEA's failure to object to or condemn these attacks raises questions about its legitimacy and independence.

Head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, Mohammad Eslami: The IAEA cannot demand to inspect sites that were subjected to military aggression unless the special protocols are adopted. The IAEA must clarify its position regarding the security status of Iranian sites that were subjected to military aggression. There is American and Israeli pressure on the IAEA to visit the destroyed sites to find out what happened to them after the military aggression. Iran is still in a state of war, and its nuclear sites have not been secured for inspection. International organizations have become mere tools in the hands of the colonial system, American arrogance, and Zionism. The IAEA's failure to object to or condemn these attacks raises questions about its legitimacy and independence.

Mohammad Eslami, head of the Atomic Energy Organization, announced on Wednesday, September 24, at a ceremony marking “Government Week,” that the International Atomic Energy Agency cannot claim to inspect sites that have been subjected to military attacks until the rules and protocols for inspecting them are formulated, approved, and announced. Eslami said: “The fact that the Agency does not protest or condemn attacks on our nuclear sites calls into question its competence and independence.” The head of the Atomic Energy Organization added: “Regarding the centers that have been attacked, the law of the parliament is our criterion. The Agency must clarify its duty regarding the security status of the sites and announce what protocol it has for sites that have been subjected to military attacks.” Eslami also said: “The United States and Israel are pressuring the Agency to visit and inspect the destroyed sites. The reason for this pressure is that they want to see what happened to these sites as a result of the military operations they have carried out.”

Mohammad Eslami, head of the Atomic Energy Organization, announced on Wednesday, September 24, at a ceremony marking “Government Week,” that the International Atomic Energy Agency cannot claim to inspect sites that have been subjected to military attacks until the rules and protocols for inspecting them are formulated, approved, and announced. Eslami said: “The fact that the Agency does not protest or condemn attacks on our nuclear sites calls into question its competence and independence.” The head of the Atomic Energy Organization added: “Regarding the centers that have been attacked, the law of the parliament is our criterion. The Agency must clarify its duty regarding the security status of the sites and announce what protocol it has for sites that have been subjected to military attacks.” Eslami also said: “The United States and Israel are pressuring the Agency to visit and inspect the destroyed sites. The reason for this pressure is that they want to see what happened to these sites as a result of the military operations they have carried out.”

Eslami: Until a protocol for inspecting the attacked sites is developed, the agency cannot claim to inspect them. On Wednesday, September 25, at the opening ceremony and unveiling of the organization's four knowledge-based achievements on the occasion of Government Week, the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) said in response to IRNA's question about the organization's latest interactions with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and whether Iran has any undeclared activities at sites such as the Koh-e-Kalang site, which the US President had previously threatened to bomb: These threats are a lesson from history that international organizations are pawns in the hands of the hegemonic and arrogant system of America and the Zionists. The Agency has a law and statute, and the Director General of the Agency has duties. We expect and hope that international organizations will no longer be abused, pressured, and their officials will not be threatened, and that they will be allowed to act according to their own rules. Our operation has been based on the Agency's safeguards and regulations. The facilities that have all been hit by military strikes are all registered with the Agency and the Agency has been continuously inspecting them. The fact that the Agency does not protest or condemn these attacks calls into question its competence and independence. In the current situation, the Agency has conducted the necessary inspections of the centers that have not been attacked, in accordance with the safeguards. However, regarding the centers that have been attacked, the law of the Parliament is the criterion for us. The Agency must clarify its duty regarding the security status of the sites and announce what protocol it has for sites that are under military attack. In a situation where the Agency does not have such a protocol and does not take a position, only the US and Israel are pressuring the Agency to visit the destroyed sites and visit them. The reason for this pressure is that they want to see what happened to these sites as a result of the military operations they have carried out. The conditions in our country are still warlike and it is not yet possible to assume that the war has ended and the security of the sites has been established. The law of the Parliament is the criterion for us, and in accordance with the same law, we have also notified the Agency of the matter. The agency also knows very well that in these circumstances, it cannot claim to inspect until the criteria and protocol for inspecting sites that have been under military attack are formulated, approved, and announced. Regarding the latest interactions with the agency in the past month, sites that have not been hit have been inspected, and this is natural and obvious. @IRNA_1313 [in reply to: Islami: The Atomic Energy Organization's institutional development supports the country's industrial quality and capability enhancement The Vice President and Head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, referring to the opening of the Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) Training Center, stated at the opening ceremony and unveiling of the organization's 4 knowledge-based achievements: "All processes and industries in the country require non-destructive testing in various ways. Creating a reputable, well-equipped, knowledgeable and committed center that can provide assessment, qualification, and skills training services for human resources is one of the great measures that began today with the efforts of the organization's experts. In addition to playing the role of the main materials organ, this center can expand this technology more strongly than before across the country." He considered quality and standardization to be based on two key components and added: Achieving quality and quality measurement requires complete mastery of two factors; first, understanding the properties of materials to identify their capabilities, lifespan, and predict their behavior, and second, accuracy in measurements and strict adherence to tolerances. If these two principles are implemented with precision, a standard level can be achieved and a standardized and competitive product can be produced. Eslami stated that nuclear industries are the first consumers of these institutional developments due to their high sensitivity, and noted: "We hope that these achievements and measures will lead to the enhancement of industrial quality, the development of technology, and the improvement of the quality of life of the dear people of Iran." @IRNA_1313]

Eslami: Until a protocol for inspecting the attacked sites is developed, the agency cannot claim to inspect them. On Wednesday, September 25, at the opening ceremony and unveiling of the organization's four knowledge-based achievements on the occasion of Government Week, the head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) said in response to IRNA's question about the organization's latest interactions with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and whether Iran has any undeclared activities at sites such as the Koh-e-Kalang site, which the US President had previously threatened to bomb: These threats are a lesson from history that international organizations are pawns in the hands of the hegemonic and arrogant system of America and the Zionists. The Agency has a law and statute, and the Director General of the Agency has duties. We expect and hope that international organizations will no longer be abused, pressured, and their officials will not be threatened, and that they will be allowed to act according to their own rules. Our operation has been based on the Agency's safeguards and regulations. The facilities that have all been hit by military strikes are all registered with the Agency and the Agency has been continuously inspecting them. The fact that the Agency does not protest or condemn these attacks calls into question its competence and independence. In the current situation, the Agency has conducted the necessary inspections of the centers that have not been attacked, in accordance with the safeguards. However, regarding the centers that have been attacked, the law of the Parliament is the criterion for us. The Agency must clarify its duty regarding the security status of the sites and announce what protocol it has for sites that are under military attack. In a situation where the Agency does not have such a protocol and does not take a position, only the US and Israel are pressuring the Agency to visit the destroyed sites and visit them. The reason for this pressure is that they want to see what happened to these sites as a result of the military operations they have carried out. The conditions in our country are still warlike and it is not yet possible to assume that the war has ended and the security of the sites has been established. The law of the Parliament is the criterion for us, and in accordance with the same law, we have also notified the Agency of the matter. The agency also knows very well that in these circumstances, it cannot claim to inspect until the criteria and protocol for inspecting sites that have been under military attack are formulated, approved, and announced. Regarding the latest interactions with the agency in the past month, sites that have not been hit have been inspected, and this is natural and obvious. @IRNA_1313 [in reply to: Islami: The Atomic Energy Organization's institutional development supports the country's industrial quality and capability enhancement The Vice President and Head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, referring to the opening of the Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) Training Center, stated at the opening ceremony and unveiling of the organization's 4 knowledge-based achievements: "All processes and industries in the country require non-destructive testing in various ways. Creating a reputable, well-equipped, knowledgeable and committed center that can provide assessment, qualification, and skills training services for human resources is one of the great measures that began today with the efforts of the organization's experts. In addition to playing the role of the main materials organ, this center can expand this technology more strongly than before across the country." He considered quality and standardization to be based on two key components and added: Achieving quality and quality measurement requires complete mastery of two factors; first, understanding the properties of materials to identify their capabilities, lifespan, and predict their behavior, and second, accuracy in measurements and strict adherence to tolerances. If these two principles are implemented with precision, a standard level can be achieved and a standardized and competitive product can be produced. Eslami stated that nuclear industries are the first consumers of these institutional developments due to their high sensitivity, and noted: "We hope that these achievements and measures will lead to the enhancement of industrial quality, the development of technology, and the improvement of the quality of life of the dear people of Iran." @IRNA_1313]

The Institute for Science and International Security released satellite images of the Isfahan nuclear complex from mid-last month and early this month, saying the images showed limited vehicle activity at the complex. The institute added that several container trucks and passenger cars were seen at various points in the complex. The institute wrote on the social network X that several cars were present in the westernmost parking lot, while parking lots closer to the main part of the complex were almost empty. According to the institute, it is not clear exactly what this activity means, but the presence of container trucks raises the question of whether the Iranian government is removing items from the remaining structures or destroyed buildings. The institute also said that as of August 3, the entrances to the tunnels were still blocked with soil and no signs of excavation or reopening had been seen.